Aligning Incentives in Healthcare Partnerships
- Matt Leshy
- 10 minutes ago
- 3 min read
Why Healthcare Organizations Need Partners Built for Transparency, Accountability, and Long-Term Outcomes
Hospitals and health systems are navigating a demanding reality: financial pressure, workforce shortages, complex reimbursement dynamics, and growing expectations to modernize. Yet progress can feel slow, especially when leaders are also managing aging systems, limited information technology capacity, and high operational risk.
At the same time, the vendor landscape is more crowded than ever. Partnerships can create real leverage, but they can also create new complexity if incentives are not aligned. When a partner’s operating model rewards short-term profitability over long-term outcomes, the hospital often absorbs the downstream cost: inconsistent service, governance friction, diminished institutional knowledge, and slower improvement.
At Signature Performance, we believe the most successful partnerships share one core trait: aligned incentives that reinforce transparency and sustained performance.
Why Aligning Incentives in Healthcare Can Be Challenging
Healthcare leaders often recognize the need to modernize, but systemic barriers can slow adoption, and several operational challenges frequently make transformation more difficult than in other industries. Many organizations operate under tight budgets with limited discretionary capital, while information technology departments are frequently overextended, maintaining legacy systems alongside daily operational demands. At the same time, organizations are understandably risk-averse, as patient safety and mission-critical responsibilities leave little room for disruption. Change can also stall due to internal friction, competing priorities, and siloed decision-making within complex organizational structures.
These factors don’t eliminate the need to improve, but they do raise the bar for partner selection. The right partner must deliver more than ideas; they must bring operational discipline, repeatable execution, and clear accountability.
What Hospitals Look for and Why Many Relationships Disappoint
Hospitals and health systems consistently look for partners who are committed to their mission and willing to engage with transparency and integrity. Many providers have experienced vendor relationships that promised cost savings but delivered opaque service models and inconsistent quality. In more damaging cases, they saw “talent drain” when vendors changed staffing approaches in ways that reduced oversight and eroded institutional knowledge.
In practical terms, hospitals want:
Trustworthy delivery with clear ownership and responsiveness.
Transparency, including early surfacing of risks and constraints.
Consistency and continuity, not constant retraining or revolving staff.
Accountability, supported by measurable KPIs and governance cadence.
No Partner Can Deliver Perfection, but Hospitals Can Demand the Right Model
Perfection is not the standard. A thoughtful, transparent approach is. Hospitals are best served by partners who can deeply understand the hospital’s unique constraints and priorities, tailor solutions rather than forcing one-size-fits-all delivery and share risks and rewards so that success is tied to outcomes, not effort alone.
A key strategy is selecting partners who provide a comprehensive, integrated portfolio. This reduces the administrative burden of coordinating multiple vendors and enabling clearer accountability across the value chain.
Learn more about Signature Performance’s approach to partnership transparency.
Operational Improvement Is Not Just Cost Cutting: It Is a Strategic Advantage
It is important to view operational improvement not merely as cost reduction, but as an opportunity to strengthen core assets. Efficient, modern operations improve financial sustainability, enhance negotiating leverage with payers, and enable reinvestment in workforce development, technology, and care delivery. Strong partners also communicate openly when challenges arise; they work collaboratively to solve problems and continuously improve, rather than shifting blame or reducing transparency.
A Practical Starting Point: Revenue Leakage
Revenue leakage is often complex and multifactorial, yet it represents one of the most immediate opportunities for financial improvement. It is commonly driven by coding and billing errors that lead to denials or delayed payments, missing authorizations and eligibility issues, underpayments tied to weak contract management, and documentation gaps that result in charge capture breakdowns. Additional contributors include ineffective patient collections and poor financial clearance, manual processes that introduce errors and slow resolution, credentialing delays and referral leakage, and legacy technology that limits organizational visibility and operational agility.
With rising payment pressure, every lost dollar matters more. Revenue cycle optimization is no longer optional. It directly affects a hospital’s ability to sustain services and reinvest in patient care.
How Signature Performance Supports Sustainable Improvement
At Signature Performance, addressing revenue leakage and operational performance is core to our mission. We partner with healthcare organizations to deliver measurable results through:
Advisory services to assess performance, identify constraints, and prioritize actions
Revenue cycle managed services to provide consistent execution and quality control
End-to-end outsourcing options to reduce operational burden while maintaining transparency
Flexible partnership structures, including risk-based models aligned to measurable outcomes
At Signature Performance, our approach is built on aligning incentives in healthcare to support transparency, accountability, and long-term commitment. We help healthcare organizations build durable operating models that strengthen financial health, protect institutional knowledge, and support the mission of high-quality, accessible care.
Ready to Dive Deeper?
Access the complete framework for deeper guidance on incentive alignment, partner selection criteria, and revenue leakage priorities.